Finding Atrocity-Free Technology is Easy

Large technology companies have been selling their software to countries and other organizations that commit violations of human rights. Sometimes the tech companies just cut off agreements and data access to organizations they don’t like, an example is when Microsoft eliminated the emails of the International Criminal Court. When we use and pay for services from some technology companies we support the development of oppressive tools and can become victims to their whims.

Multitudes of alternatives exist and a new site is listing technologies that are no connected with human rights abuses.

Lysverket is committed to promoting an open dialogue about the importance of informed citizenship in a democratic society. Here, we believe that everyone has a role to play in uncovering facts that are important to our society.

We offer resources and a collaborative environment for individuals and groups interested in investigative practice, whether through traditional journalistic methods or innovative digital tools. Through workshops, discussions, and joint projects, we aim to cultivate a diversity of voices that can contribute to social justice and meaningful change.

Read more.

Former ICC Judge Wants to Criminalize Ecocide

Florence Mumba, a former judge of the International Criminal Court, is working hard to make ecological destruction a criminal act. Mumba and a whole team of international lawyers are focusing on getting legal definitions for ecocide and want to eventually charge people, governments, and corporations that commit massive ecological destruction. Small islands nations facing extinction due to climate change have called for this before, and so it’s really good to see that there is a concerted effort to put into international law the protection of our planet.

Sands said: “The time is right to harness the power of international criminal law to protect our global environment … My hope is that this group will be able to … forge a definition that is practical, effective and sustainable, and that might attract support to allow an amendment to the ICC statute to be made.”

Mumba, a judge at the Khmer Rouge tribunal and former supreme court judge in Zambia, said: “An international crime of ecocide may be important in that individual/state responsibility may be regulated to achieve balance for the survival of both humanity and nature.”

Jojo Mehta, the chair of the Stop Ecocide Foundation, told the Guardian: “In most cases ecocide is likely to be a corporate crime. Criminalising something at the ICC means that nations that have ratified it have to incorporate it into their own national legislation.

“That means there would be lots of options for prosecuting [offending corporations] around the world.”

Read more.

Scroll To Top