Using Dirt From Tunnels to Build New Stuff

picture of a tunnelling machine

Digging a subway means cutting through a lot of dirt, but what to do with it? This is the question that has troubled many construction sites throughout the years and depending on where you’re digging dirt you have different options. The worst, but all too common, option is to send the dirt to a landfill as ridiculous as that sounds. When Line 2 was being built in Toronto they used the dirt to build a whole new park and that approach is becoming popular the world over. Now Toronto is building a new subway and the dirt is being used in nifty ways too.

The hallmark for all cities to get to is the standard set by Paris.

Some global jurisdictions have pushed further into circular approaches that go beyond simple reuse. In France, large volumes of soil from metro construction projects have been integrated into systems designed to keep material within the local economy. Regional operators manage large-scale soil redistribution for parks, green spaces, and land restoration, creating a coordinated soil logistics network across Paris.

Paris’s proactive initiatives like Cycle Terre, carried out between 2018 and 2021, processed suitable excavated clay from the Grand Paris Express project into compressed earth blocks and other low-carbon building materials from a factory 10 kilometres from the excavation sites. This resulted in relatively short transport times and effectively turned soil into a construction input rather than a disposal burden. Ultimately, however, the initiative failed to generate enough commercial contracts and went into liquidation.

Read more.

Make a Boring Thing Fun by Adding More Boredom

I use this technique quite a lot, but somebody else wrote about it in a way better than I could. If you can do two boring tasks at the same time you’ll have an enjoyable experience.

I’ve noticed several related things: 1. I could easily study flashcards while walking. This was less mysterious because I coded walking as pleasant. 2. I can’ t bear to watch TV sitting down. Walking on a treadmill makes it bearable. This didn’t puzzle me because I coded TV watching as pleasant and sitting as unpleasant (although I sit by choice while doing many other things). 3. I have Pimsler Chinese lessons (audio). I can painlessly listen to them while walking. While stationary (sitting or standing), it’s hard to listen to them. 4. When writing (during which I sit), it’s very effective to work for 40 minutes and then walk on my treadmill watching something enjoyable for 20 minutes. I can repeat that cycle many times. 5. Allen Neuringer found he was better at memorization while moving than while stationary. 6. There’s some sort of movement/thinking connection — we move our arms when we talk, we may like to walk while we talk, maybe walking makes it easier to think, and so on.

You could say that walking causes a “thirst” for learning or learning causes a “thirst” for walking. Except that the “thirst” is so hidden I discovered it only by accident. Whereas actual thirst is obvious. The usual idea is that what’s pleasant shows what’s good for us — e.g., water is pleasant when we are thirsty. Yet if walking is good for us — a common idea — why isn’t it pleasant all by itself? And if Anki is good for us, why isn’t it pleasant all by itself? The Anki/treadmill symmetry is odd because lots of people think we need exercise to be healthy but I’ve never heard someone say we need to study to be healthy.

Read more at Seth’s blog