It’s been known for years that urban centres have a lower carbon footprint than the lands of urban sprawl. This is a for a variety of reasons and it’s rather complex, sure most of it comes down to density, but the exact know how is still being figure out.
Over at Alternatives Journal they looked at how building sustainable cities makes better cities overall. This is how and why people make resilient cities.
FOR EXAMPLE, existing low-density suburban developments â€œactually increase the damage on the environment while also making that damage harder to see and to address,â€ wrote Green Metropolis author David Owen. Although Forbes ranked Vermont as the greenest US state in 2007, Owenâ€™s 2009 article revealed that a typical Vermonter consumed 2,063 litres of gasoline per year â€“ almost 400 hundred litres more than the US national average at that time. This vast consumption is primarily due to single-use zoning and the absence of a comprehensive public transit system. Contrary to popular belief, dense cities such as New York City typically have the lowest carbon footprints. NYC emits 7.1 tonnes of greenhouse gases per person per year, or less than 30 per cent of the US national average. This is due to its extreme compactness. Over 80 per cent of Manhattanites travel to work by public transit, by bicycle or on foot. Population density also lowers energy and water use, limits material consumption and decreases the production of solid waste. For example, Japanâ€™s urban areas are five times denser than Canadaâ€™s, and the consumption of energy per capita in Japan is 40 per cent lower.